Purpose
The reporting form captures an incident in a consistent structure so reviewers can decide what happened, what still needs clarification, and who should see the record. It is not just a free-text note. The structured fields power the dashboard, search, review queue, trusted partner visibility, and later incident history.
Required report fields
- Title: A short label that describes the operational issue. Use "Suspicious vehicle near north entrance" instead of "Problem today."
- Summary: One clear paragraph that states what happened and why it matters.
- Detailed narrative: Chronology, direct observations, staff response, law enforcement involvement, and follow-up needs.
- Incident type: A structured category that helps search and pattern recognition.
- Occurred at: The event time, not simply the time the report is being submitted.
- Tags: Searchable labels for patterns such as vehicle, children, repeat-pattern, parking, or threat-statement.
Severity and operational status
Severity should describe potential impact and urgency. Operational status should describe what is still happening or needed. A medium severity report can still be open, and a high severity report can be monitoring if immediate action has already been taken.
- Low: Notable but limited concern, usually no immediate escalation.
- Medium: Meaningful security concern requiring review or follow-up.
- High: Serious concern that may affect operations, safety posture, or partner awareness.
- Critical: Immediate or severe issue requiring expedited attention.
Location and mapped sites
Use a saved mapped site whenever possible. Saved sites provide coordinates for the dashboard map and reduce ambiguity for reviewers. The campus or location detail should still describe the exact place involved: north entrance, children's wing, west parking lot, lobby, or off-site event location.
If no saved site is selected, the report can still be submitted, but it may not appear on the incident map until a mapped site exists.
Visibility choices
Visibility controls who should eventually be able to read the report after review. Use the narrowest option that supports the operational need.
- Origin only: Keep the report inside the submitting organization.
- Selected partners: Share with specific connected organizations according to organization defaults.
- Trust group: Make the report available to a defined coalition of connected partners.
- Region: Use for broader regional awareness when the issue is not limited to one relationship.
Report quality checklist
- State only what was observed directly, and label assumptions as assumptions.
- Include event time, location, and staff response.
- Avoid unnecessary personal identifiers unless they are operationally relevant.
- Add tags that a future reviewer would search for.
- Choose visibility intentionally rather than leaving broad sharing on by habit.
Next recommended article
After a report is submitted, reviewers use the review queue to decide what happens next.